Forget the crustal faults running through Portland. By far the biggest hazard facing Portland and surrounding communities is a Cascadia Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquake (magnitude 9+). A subduction zone megathrust earthquake is far more powerful than most earthquakes we hear about, and Cascadia is among the largest of this breed. The next big Cascadia earthquake is likely to rank no less than fourth in the list of largest earthquakes in recorded history. But that's only part of the story.
Cascadia earthquakes devastate a vast region: from southern Canada to northern California, from the Pacific Ocean to the Cascade Mountains (approximately 84,000 square miles). Rarely do earthquakes have a 700 mile long epicenter. The December 26, 2004 Sumatra earthquake (which caused the Indian Ocean tsunami) was one. Its subduction zone is nearly a twin of Cascadia, and it is the only other subduction zone known to slip all at once, like Cascadia. That earthquake actually caused a measurable wobble in the earth's rotation and altered the earth’s gravitational field! We heard very little about the earthquake itself because it occurred away from a large, heavily-populated land mass. That will not be the case for Cascadia. The smaller scale, yet nonetheless devastating 2011 Sendai (Honshu), Japan earthquake and tsunami is a good preview of what to expect along the Oregon and Washington coastline from a Cascadia Megathrust Subduction Zone earthquake. And while inland cities may be spared a tsunami, they will still be rattled by a M9+ "great" quake lasting up to five minutes. There have only been a couple earthquakes in recorded history with a moment magnitude which may rival or exceed Cascadia, but for the total amount of energy released, Cascadia and Sumatra are unrivaled, massive events.
We are being lulled into a false sense of security when we are told that many of our buildings and bridges are being upgraded for a major earthquake. A "major" earthquake is defined as M7.0–7.9. A "great" earthquake is anything ≥ M8. Portland's seismic codes only anticipate a M7.0 quake. A Cascadia M9+ will be over 1,000 times more energetic than our seismic codes anticipate. Only Japan and Chile try to address such massive earthquakes in their seismic codes. See Portland’s Feeble Seismic Codes for more information.
While we face a variety of threats, such as terrorism, accidents, and natural disasters, if you’re prepared for Cascadia, you’re prepared for almost any kind of disaster. And there is no doubt that Cascadia is coming. The only question is when? The more we learn about Cascadia, the higher the probability becomes. Chris Goldfinger of OSU, who has studied Cascadia extensively, now says he expects a great quake before 2060. We are already past the 300 year cluster average between major events, and have exceeded 75% of the quiet periods between quakes in Cascadia's history.
This web-book is a living document. Our initial focus is Cascadia (as that is our worst-case scenario); in time we may include information on a wider range of hazards.
Map USGSWe can expect more damage and destruction in the Pacific Northwest from a large (total rupture) Cascadia megathrust earthquake than Japan experienced in their 2011 Sendai (Honshu) quake for two reasons: Cascadia routinely ruptures along a much longer fault, and our seismic building codes are significantly weaker than Japan’s (our building codes only anticipate a M7 quake, whereas Japan’s codes anticipate M9 quakes).
The Nova program “Japan's Killer Quake” documents the awesome power and destructiveness of a M9 earthquake. It also contains a short discussion about the Cascadia subduction zone and our region. The show is well worth watching (and you are encouraged to follow the link); it's a wake-up call to the Pacific Northwest.
While much of the graphic devastation in Japan was due to the tsunami, it’s important to remember that Japan’s much stronger seismic codes protected their inland areas in ways our inland areas won’t be. Their buildings are far more resilient and earthquake resistant than ours. A Cascadia quake is likely to do a great deal more damage inland in our region than the Sendai quake did to inland Japan.
Clearly our coastal areas will experience large tsunamis every bit as powerful as Japan’s. What is unclear is how far up the Columbia River a tsunami wave might travel, and how much water it might carry. Also unclear is whether Columbia River damns might breach. Portland has enough to worry about even if we don’t ponder breaching damns and monster inland tsunamis (scenarios which could occur, but hopefully won’t).
We already know that Cascadia quakes of the past — such as the 1700 quake — have caused costal areas to subside and flood. Japan experienced this in the 2011 Sendai quake (it was a factor in some of the tsunami wall breaches). We would be fools not to consider the Sendai quake as a preview of what to expect in the Pacific NW. We need to prepare, become better educated about hazards and how to respond, and we need to build stronger, more resilient buildings and structures.
An episode of the History Channel’s How The Earth Was Made TV series, titled Tsunami, has an in-depth discussion of the Cascadia subduction zone, an account of the history of the initial research into its geology, and graphically illustrates the magnitude of threat it poses to our area. Follow the link to watch the full episode.
[Embedded on the right is a segment of a Nova episode: Deadliest Earthquakes. Follow the link to watch the full episode.]
The Nova program “Deadliest Earthquakes” (embedded below) documents some epic earthquakes of 2010, describes slip fault and subduction zone earthquakes, tsunamis, some of the earthquake latest research, early warning systems, and the need to build more earthquake resilient structures. About halfway into the video, at about 26 minutes, is a discussion of the Cascadia subduction zone and the Pacific Northwest.
Or watch on the PBS website. Here is NOVA website.
Cascadia segment:
The Nova program “Japan's Killer Quake” (embedded below) documents the awesome power and destructiveness of a M9 earthquake. It also contains a discussion about the Cascadia subduction zone and the Pacific Northwest. There is a brief commercial before the program begins.